You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Educated acquiescence: how academia sustains authoritarianism in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theory and Society, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11186-019-09373-1 |
| Authors |
Elizabeth J. Perry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Austria | 3 | 3% |
| Thailand | 3 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 52 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 71% |
| Scientists | 22 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 27% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 20 | 38% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#658,697
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Theory and Society
#9
of 495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,030
of 480,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory and Society
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.