↓ Skip to main content

Catalases in plants

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Breeding, September 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
366 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Catalases in plants
Published in
Molecular Breeding, September 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf02277422
Authors

H. Willekens, D. Inzé, M. Van Montagu, W. van Camp

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 36 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 10%
Unspecified 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 37 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,481,847
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Breeding
#154
of 543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,038
of 23,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Breeding
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 543 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.