↓ Skip to main content

Waiting for more: the performance of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) on exchange tasks

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Waiting for more: the performance of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) on exchange tasks
Published in
Animal Cognition, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10071-011-0437-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca J. Leonardi, Sarah-Jane Vick, Valérie Dufour

Abstract

Five domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) were tested in a cooperative exchange task with an experimenter, as previously tested in non-human primates. In the first task, the dogs exchanged to maximise payoffs when presented with food items of differing quality. All consistently exchanged lower-value for higher-value rewards, as determined by their individual food preference, and exchanges corresponded significantly with the spontaneous preferences of three dogs. Next, all subjects demonstrated an ability to perform two and three exchanges in succession, to gain both qualitative and quantitatively increased rewards (group mean = 72 and 92% successful triple exchanges, respectively). Finally, the ability to delay gratification over increasing intervals was tested; the dogs kept one food item to exchange later for a larger item. As previously reported in non-human primates, there was considerable individual variation in the tolerance of delays, between 10 s and 10 min for the largest rewards. For those who reached longer time lags (>40 s), the dogs gave up the chance to exchange earlier than expected by each subject's general waiting capacity; the dogs anticipated delay duration and made decisions according to the relative reward values offered. Compared to primates, dogs tolerated relatively long delays for smaller value rewards, suggesting that the socio-ecological history of domestic dogs facilitates their performance on decision-making and delay of gratification tasks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Hungary 2 2%
Austria 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 112 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 19%
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Master 16 13%
Other 8 6%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 40%
Psychology 23 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 5%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 27 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2012.
All research outputs
#16,193,405
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#1,244
of 1,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,462
of 128,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.