↓ Skip to main content

Brief review: Theory and practice of minimal fresh gas flow anesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Brief review: Theory and practice of minimal fresh gas flow anesthesia
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12630-012-9736-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Metha Brattwall, Margareta Warrén-Stomberg, Fredrik Hesselvik, Jan Jakobsson

Abstract

The aim of this brief review is to provide an update on the theory regarding minimal fresh gas flow techniques for inhaled general anesthesia. The article also includes an update and discussion of the practical aspects associated with minimal-flow anesthesia, including the advantages, potential limitations, and safety considerations of this important anesthetic technique.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 134 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 20 14%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 38 27%
Unknown 30 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 62%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 35 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2012.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2,181
of 2,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,769
of 179,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.