↓ Skip to main content

Attentional Bias in Problem Gambling: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Attentional Bias in Problem Gambling: A Systematic Review
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10899-012-9315-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Audhild Hønsi, Rune Aune Mentzoni, Helge Molde, Ståle Pallesen

Abstract

Attentional bias has been the subject of extensive empirical investigation in connection with chemical addictions, and it has been demonstrated in users of several different substances. The findings show that substance users seem to notice and attend to substance-related stimuli more readily than non-substance-related stimuli. Less is known, however, about attentional bias in pathological gambling. This systematic review investigates the existing empirical evidence on attentional bias in problem and pathological gamblers. Eleven studies were identified and evaluated following a literature search. Key findings are that problem and pathological gamblers seem to exhibit attentional bias toward gambling-related stimuli across different measuring paradigms, although some negative findings were reported. Recommendations aimed at improving research on this topic include better validation of measures, the inclusion of manipulations of craving level, and adding variations in gambling severity as a variable, as well as gambling preference. Research on therapeutic procedures aimed at reducing attentional bias is also recommended.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 95 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 21%
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 53%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 18 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2014.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#656
of 989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,774
of 178,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.