You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Small-scale water deficits after wildfires create long-lasting ecological impacts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/ab79e4 |
| Authors |
Rory C OConnor, Matthew J Germino, David M Barnard, Caitlin M Andrews, John B Bradford, David S Pilliod, Robert S Arkle, Robert K Shriver |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 42% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 16 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,294,023
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#2,537
of 6,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,846
of 391,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#61
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.