↓ Skip to main content

Reply to Phillip Johnson

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, October 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Reply to Phillip Johnson
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, October 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00138332
Authors

Richard Dawkins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 40%
Philosophy 1 20%
Psychology 1 20%
Social Sciences 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2012.
All research outputs
#18,308,895
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#576
of 660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,153
of 28,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.