You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Too complex and time-consuming to fit in! Physicians' experiences of elderly patients and their participation in medical decision making: a grounded theory study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Open, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001063 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anne Wissendorff Ekdahl, Ingrid Hellström, Lars Andersson, Maria Friedrichsen |
Abstract |
To explore physicians' thoughts and considerations of participation in medical decision making by hospitalised elderly patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
Sweden | 2 | 22% |
Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Argentina | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 68 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
Lecturer | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 23% |
Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 19 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,754,534
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#7,239
of 25,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,470
of 179,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#43
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.