↓ Skip to main content

Influence of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration on the outcome of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, histological, X-ray and MRI investigation

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Influence of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration on the outcome of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, histological, X-ray and MRI investigation
Published in
European Spine Journal, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00586-012-2342-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph J. Siepe, Franziska Heider, Elisabeth Haas, Wolfgang Hitzl, Ulrike Szeimies, Axel Stäbler, Christoph Weiler, Andreas G. Nerlich, Michael H. Mayer

Abstract

The role of fusion of lumbar motion segments for the treatment of axial low back pain (LBP) from lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) without any true deformities or instabilities remains controversially debated. In an attempt to avoid previously published and fusion-related negative side effects, motion preserving technologies such as total lumbar disc replacement (TDR) have been introduced. The adequate extent of preoperative DDD for TDR remains unknown, the number of previously published studies is scarce and the limited data available reveal contradictory results. The goal of this current analysis was to perform a prospective histological, X-ray and MRI investigation of the index-segment's degree of DDD and to correlate these data with each patient's pre- and postoperative clinical outcome parameters from an ongoing prospective clinical trial with ProDisc II (Synthes, Paoli, U.S.A.).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Master 13 14%
Other 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Engineering 6 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 23 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2012.
All research outputs
#20,159,700
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#3,640
of 4,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,122
of 165,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#44
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,594 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.