↓ Skip to main content

Mass stranding of crown-of-thorns starfish

Overview of attention for article published in Coral Reefs, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Mass stranding of crown-of-thorns starfish
Published in
Coral Reefs, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00338-012-0906-z
Authors

G. Suzuki, S. Kai, H. Yamashita

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 37%
Researcher 6 32%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 32%
Environmental Science 3 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2012.
All research outputs
#2,683,382
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Coral Reefs
#378
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,869
of 163,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Coral Reefs
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them