| Title |
Subclavian and Axillary Vein Access Versus Cephalic Vein Cutdown for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation A Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.01.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Varunsiri Atti, Mohit K Turagam, Jalaj Garg, Scott Koerber, Aakash Angirekula, Rakesh Gopinathannair, Andrea Natale, Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 36% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Kazakhstan | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 16% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 47% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,206,303
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#221
of 1,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,859
of 394,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.