↓ Skip to main content

Is neuroeconomics doomed by the reverse inference fallacy?

Overview of attention for article published in Mind & Society, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Is neuroeconomics doomed by the reverse inference fallacy?
Published in
Mind & Society, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11299-010-0076-z
Authors

Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Turkey 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 39 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Master 8 18%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Professor 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 31%
Social Sciences 7 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2012.
All research outputs
#18,308,895
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Mind & Society
#76
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,290
of 96,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mind & Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them