| Title |
Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Variation in Practice and Outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neel M. Butala, Mabel Chung, Eric A. Secemsky, Pratik Manandhar, Guillaume Marquis-Gravel, Andrzej S. Kosinski, Sreekanth Vemulapalli, Robert W. Yeh, David J. Cohen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 33 | 46% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Argentina | 3 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 66% |
| Scientists | 10 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#576,707
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#125
of 4,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,364
of 433,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#6
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.