↓ Skip to main content

HIV Risk Behavior Among HIV-Infected Men Who have Sex with Men in Bangkok, Thailand

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
HIV Risk Behavior Among HIV-Infected Men Who have Sex with Men in Bangkok, Thailand
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10461-011-9884-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pachara Sirivongrangson, Rangsima Lolekha, Angkana Charoenwatanachokchai, Umaporn Siangphoe, Kimberley K. Fox, Naiyana Jirarojwattana, Liesbeth Bollen, Naruemon Yenyarsan, Somchai Lokpichat, Orapin Suksripanich, Michelle McConnell

Abstract

We assessed prevalence of sexually transmitted infection (STIs), sexual risk behaviors, and factors associated with risk behaviors among HIV-infected MSM attending a public STI clinic serving MSM in Bangkok, Thailand. Between October 2005-October 2007, 154 HIV-infected MSM attending the clinic were interviewed about sexual risk behaviors and evaluated for STIs. Patients were examined for genital ulcers and had serologic testing for syphilis and PCR testing for chlamydia and gonorrhea. Results showed that sexual intercourse in the last 3 months was reported by 131 men. Of these, 32% reported anal sex without a condom. STIs were diagnosed in 41%. Factors associated with having sex without a condom were having a steady male partner, having a female partner and awareness of HIV status <1 month. Sexual risk behaviors and STIs were common among HIV-infected MSM in this study. This highlights the need for increased HIV prevention strategies for HIV-infected MSM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 30%
Social Sciences 7 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Psychology 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,165,451
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#1,191
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,983
of 187,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#11
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.