| Title |
Key issues and options in accounting for carbon sequestration and temporary storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-012-0451-6 |
| Authors |
Miguel Brandão, Annie Levasseur, Miko U. F. Kirschbaum, Bo P. Weidema, Annette L. Cowie, Susanne Vedel Jørgensen, Michael Z. Hauschild, David W. Pennington, Kirana Chomkhamsri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Chile | 1 | 17% |
| Norway | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 554 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 533 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 124 | 22% |
| Researcher | 119 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 68 | 12% |
| Unknown | 130 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 156 | 28% |
| Engineering | 83 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 84 | 15% |
| Unknown | 169 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,675,283
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#298
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,508
of 182,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.