Title |
Influence of social and material individual and area deprivation on suicide mortality among 2.7 million Canadians: A prospective study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-577 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephanie Burrows, Nathalie Auger, Philippe Gamache, Danielle St-Laurent, Denis Hamel |
Abstract |
Few studies have investigated how area-level deprivation influences the relationship between individual disadvantage and suicide mortality. The aim of this study was to examine individual measures of material and social disadvantage in relation to suicide mortality in Canada and to determine whether these relationships were modified by area deprivation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 75 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 14% |
Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
Other | 19 | 24% |
Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 30% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 20% |
Psychology | 10 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2012.
All research outputs
#15,245,883
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,245
of 14,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,926
of 119,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#165
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.