↓ Skip to main content

Body Temperatures of Snakes in the Fields

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Herpetologica Japonica, January 1985
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Body Temperatures of Snakes in the Fields
Published in
Acta Herpetologica Japonica, January 1985
DOI 10.5358/hsj1972.11.1_25
Authors

Hajime FUKADA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,716,445
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Acta Herpetologica Japonica
#4
of 25 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,102
of 39,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Herpetologica Japonica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them