| Title |
Biocompatibility and biodegradability of spider egg sac silk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10856-007-3330-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kris Gellynck, Peter Verdonk, Ramses Forsyth, Karl Fredrik Almqvist, Els Van Nimmen, Tom Gheysens, Johan Mertens, Lieva Van Langenhove, Paul Kiekens, Gust Verbruggen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 24% |
| Chemistry | 12 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,558,494
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#316
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,775
of 81,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.