Title |
Health Status Changes and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Mitral Regurgitation COAPT Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.002 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Suzanne V. Arnold, Gregg W. Stone, Michael J. Mack, Adnan K. Chhatriwalla, Bethany A. Austin, Zixuan Zhang, Ori Ben-Yehuda, Saibal Kar, D. Scott Lim, JoAnn Lindenfeld, William T. Abraham, David J. Cohen, COAPT Investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 24% |
Spain | 10 | 24% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
Austria | 1 | 2% |
Peru | 1 | 2% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 25 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 29% |
Scientists | 3 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 16% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 19% |
Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 47% |
Psychology | 3 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 23 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,008,118
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,494
of 16,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,286
of 393,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#74
of 361 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 361 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.