| Title |
A Trial of Lopinavir–Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Severe Covid-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa2001282 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bin Cao, Yeming Wang, Danning Wen, Wen Liu, Jingli Wang, Guohui Fan, Lianguo Ruan, Bin Song, Yanping Cai, Ming Wei, Xingwang Li, Jiaan Xia, Nanshan Chen, Jie Xiang, Ting Yu, Tao Bai, Xuelei Xie, Li Zhang, Caihong Li, Ye Yuan, Hua Chen, Huadong Li, Hanping Huang, Shengjing Tu, Fengyun Gong, Ying Liu, Yuan Wei, Chongya Dong, Fei Zhou, Xiaoying Gu, Jiuyang Xu, Zhibo Liu, Yi Zhang, Hui Li, Lianhan Shang, Ke Wang, Kunxia Li, Xia Zhou, Xuan Dong, Zhaohui Qu, Sixia Lu, Xujuan Hu, Shunan Ruan, Shanshan Luo, Jing Wu, Lu Peng, Fang Cheng, Lihong Pan, Jun Zou, Chunmin Jia, Juan Wang, Xia Liu, Shuzhen Wang, Xudong Wu, Qin Ge, Jing He, Haiyan Zhan, Fang Qiu, Li Guo, Chaolin Huang, Thomas Jaki, Frederick G Hayden, Peter W Horby, Dingyu Zhang, Chen Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7,396 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1176 | 16% |
| Spain | 482 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 295 | 4% |
| France | 280 | 4% |
| Japan | 191 | 3% |
| Canada | 140 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 118 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 101 | 1% |
| Brazil | 88 | 1% |
| Other | 1327 | 18% |
| Unknown | 3198 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5651 | 76% |
| Scientists | 865 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 736 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 142 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6,059 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6059 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 745 | 12% |
| Researcher | 705 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 536 | 9% |
| Other | 482 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 445 | 7% |
| Other | 1298 | 21% |
| Unknown | 1848 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1708 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 435 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 419 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 199 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 180 | 3% |
| Other | 948 | 16% |
| Unknown | 2170 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#294
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#29
of 32,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32
of 392,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#8
of 333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 123.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.