↓ Skip to main content

気中浮遊微生物としてのウイルスの計測における捕集技術の課題と目指すべき将来像

Overview of attention for article published in Earozoru Kenkyu, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
気中浮遊微生物としてのウイルスの計測における捕集技術の課題と目指すべき将来像
Published in
Earozoru Kenkyu, December 2019
DOI 10.11203/jar.34.219
Authors

成畑 晃希, 坂本 俊哉, 三木 慎一郎, 阪井 英隆

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 17%
Physics and Astronomy 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2020.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Earozoru Kenkyu
#34
of 51 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,349
of 473,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earozoru Kenkyu
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them