You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Contaminant Subsidies to Riparian Food Webs in Appalachian Streams Impacted by Mountaintop Removal Coal Mining
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1021/acs.est.9b05907 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura C. Naslund, Jacqueline R. Gerson, Alexander C. Brooks, David M. Walters, Emily S. Bernhardt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 46% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| China | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 57% |
| Scientists | 10 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 6 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 15% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#719,988
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#1,069
of 20,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,570
of 392,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#26
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.