↓ Skip to main content

The role of epigenetic regulation in stem cell and cancer biology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Medicine, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
The role of epigenetic regulation in stem cell and cancer biology
Published in
Journal of Molecular Medicine, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00109-012-0917-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lilian E. van Vlerken, Elaine M. Hurt, Robert E. Hollingsworth

Abstract

Normal development and homeostasis requires a carefully coordinated gene expression program. Appropriate transcriptional regulation is maintained, in part, through epigenetic modifications of both DNA and histones. It is now apparent that the epigenetic landscape is complex and carefully controlled to both silence and activate gene transcription and that these states remain exquisitely poised for reversal. The deregulation of epigenetics in cancer is common and results in both the activation of oncogenes and the silencing of tumor suppressors. A tremendous amount of research corroborates the existence in many tumor types of a cancer stem cell that is both the origin and cell type responsible for resistance of tumors to current therapies. As our understanding of cancer stem cell biology continues, it is apparent that these cells are also under the influence of epigenetic regulation. We will discuss the cancer stem cell hypothesis and the role of epigenetics in both normal and cancer stem cell biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 3%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Chemistry 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,892,319
of 25,260,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#511
of 1,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,360
of 171,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,260,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.