↓ Skip to main content

Traumatic Wound Microbiome Workshop

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Traumatic Wound Microbiome Workshop
Published in
Microbial Ecology, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00248-012-0070-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. C. Kirkup, D. W. Craft, T. Palys, C. Black, R. Heitkamp, C. Li, Y. Lu, N. Matlock, C. McQueary, A. Michels, G. Peck, Y. Si, A. M. Summers, M. Thompson, D. V. Zurawski

Abstract

On May 9-10, 2011, the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, as the Army Center of Excellence for Infectious Disease, assembled over a dozen leaders in areas related to research into the communities of microorganisms which colonize and infect traumatic wounds. The objectives of the workshop were to obtain guidance for government researchers, to spur research community involvement in the field of traumatic wound research informed by a microbiome perspective, and to spark collaborative efforts serving the Wounded Warriors and similarly wounded civilians. During the discussions, it was made clear that the complexity of these infections will only be met by developing a new art of clinical practice that engages the numerous microbes and their ecology. It requires the support of dedicated laboratories and technologists who advance research methods such as community sequencing, as well as the kinds of data analysis expertise and facilities. These strategies already appear to be bearing fruit in the clinical management of chronic wounds. There are now funding announcements and programs supporting this area of research open to extramural collaborators.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Lecturer 5 12%
Librarian 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 12%
Engineering 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2012.
All research outputs
#18,308,895
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#1,669
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,493
of 164,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.