↓ Skip to main content

Identification of sucrose synthase in nonphotosynthetic bacteria and characterization of the recombinant enzymes

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Identification of sucrose synthase in nonphotosynthetic bacteria and characterization of the recombinant enzymes
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00253-015-6548-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margo Diricks, Frederik De Bruyn, Paul Van Daele, Maarten Walmagh, Tom Desmet

Abstract

Sucrose synthase (SuSy) catalyzes the reversible conversion of sucrose and a nucleoside diphosphate into fructose and nucleotide (NDP)-glucose. To date, only SuSy's from plants and cyanobacteria, both photosynthetic organisms, have been characterized. Here, four prokaryotic SuSy enzymes from the nonphotosynthetic organisms Nitrosomonas Europaea (SuSyNe), Acidithiobacillus caldus (SuSyAc), Denitrovibrio acetiphilus (SusyDa), and Melioribacter roseus (SuSyMr) were recombinantly expressed in Escherichia coli and thoroughly characterized. The purified enzymes were found to display high-temperature optima (up to 80 °C), high activities (up to 125 U/mg), and high thermostability (up to 15 min at 60 °C). Furthermore, SuSyAc, SuSyNe, and SuSyDa showed a clear preference for ADP as nucleotide, as opposed to plant SuSy's which prefer UDP. A structural and mutational analysis was performed to elucidate the difference in NDP preference between eukaryotic and prokaryotic SuSy's. Finally, the physiological relevance of this enzyme specificity is discussed in the context of metabolic pathways and genomic organization.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 25%
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 24%
Chemistry 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,625,854
of 24,535,155 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#552
of 8,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,270
of 269,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#12
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,535,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.