↓ Skip to main content

Palliative Care Afterhours

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology nursing, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Palliative Care Afterhours
Published in
Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology nursing, May 2012
DOI 10.1177/1043454212446023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie Bradford, Helen Irving, Anthony C. Smith, Lee-Anne Pedersen, Anthony Herbert

Abstract

Families caring for a child with incurable cancer require access to support and advice round the clock. In Brisbane, Australia, an after-hours phone service was established to support these families. This service is operated by oncology clinical nurse consultants (CNCs) experienced in pediatric palliative care. This is the first review of 8 years of activity, totaling 106 patients and 1954 calls. The majority of calls were between parents and CNCs (51%). Updating of the patient's condition (18%) was the primary reason for calls, with support and reassurance (16%), and symptom management of pain (10%) being the other frequent reasons. The majority of calls occurred over the weekends in the morning, with only 11% (n = 209) of calls occurring between 10:00 pm and 7:00 am. Of all the calls made, 43% (n = 814) were calls managed by the CNC without requiring further intervention. Calls were received from throughout Queensland, indicating the value of the service in supporting families throughout the state. The after-hours phone service has proven to be a simple, effective, and valuable service, which is consistently accessed by families, regardless of distance from the hospital.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Master 14 14%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 15%
Psychology 12 12%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 29 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology nursing
#232
of 343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,081
of 178,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology nursing
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.