↓ Skip to main content

The life cycle of Trypanosoma (Nannomonas) congolense in the tsetse fly

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
Title
The life cycle of Trypanosoma (Nannomonas) congolense in the tsetse fly
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-5-109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lori Peacock, Simon Cook, Vanessa Ferris, Mick Bailey, Wendy Gibson

Abstract

The tsetse-transmitted African trypanosomes cause diseases of importance to the health of both humans and livestock. The life cycles of these trypanosomes in the fly were described in the last century, but comparatively few details are available for Trypanosoma (Nannomonas) congolense, despite the fact that it is probably the most prevalent and widespread pathogenic species for livestock in tropical Africa. When the fly takes up bloodstream form trypanosomes, the initial establishment of midgut infection and invasion of the proventriculus is much the same in T. congolense and T. brucei. However, the developmental pathways subsequently diverge, with production of infective metacyclics in the proboscis for T. congolense and in the salivary glands for T. brucei. Whereas events during migration from the proventriculus are understood for T. brucei, knowledge of the corresponding developmental pathway in T. congolense is rudimentary. The recent publication of the genome sequence makes it timely to re-investigate the life cycle of T. congolense.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 178 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 21%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 41 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 45 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2012.
All research outputs
#17,634,903
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#3,776
of 5,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,511
of 164,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#34
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.