Title |
Intravenous Statin Administration During Myocardial Infarction Compared With Oral Post-Infarct Administration
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.042 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guiomar Mendieta, Soumaya Ben-Aicha, Manuel Gutiérrez, Laura Casani, Monika Aržanauskaitė, Francesc Carreras, Manel Sabate, Lina Badimon, Gemma Vilahur |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 10 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 12% |
United States | 5 | 6% |
Colombia | 4 | 5% |
Poland | 2 | 3% |
Chile | 2 | 3% |
Saudi Arabia | 2 | 3% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 28 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 56 | 72% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 14% |
Scientists | 8 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
Researcher | 7 | 15% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 38% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2020.
All research outputs
#883,292
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,198
of 16,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,164
of 385,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#56
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.