| Title |
Robotic‐assisted TKA Reduces Postoperative Alignment Outliers and Improves Gap Balance Compared to Conventional TKA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-012-2407-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
EunKyoo Song, JongKeun Seon, JiHyeon Yim, Nathan A. Netravali, William L. Bargar |
| Abstract |
Several studies have shown mechanical alignment influences the outcome of TKA. Robotic systems have been developed to improve the precision and accuracy of achieving component position and mechanical alignment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 281 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 11% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 55 | 19% |
| Unknown | 76 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 42% |
| Engineering | 30 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 101 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2012.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5,355
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,792
of 288,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#77
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.