| Title |
Comparison of Echocardiographic Assessment of Tricuspid Regurgitation Against Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.01.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yang Zhan, Alpana Senapati, Pimprapa Vejpongsa, Jiaqiong Xu, Dipan J Shah, Sherif F Nagueh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 16% |
| Colombia | 8 | 6% |
| Argentina | 6 | 5% |
| Mexico | 6 | 5% |
| Spain | 6 | 5% |
| Peru | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 41 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 92 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 15% |
| Scientists | 10 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 57% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2021.
All research outputs
#569,848
of 25,839,971 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#128
of 2,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,632
of 392,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#2
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,839,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.