↓ Skip to main content

Empathic-like responding by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) to distress in humans: an exploratory study

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 1,577)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
57 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
15 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
8 Google+ users
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Empathic-like responding by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) to distress in humans: an exploratory study
Published in
Animal Cognition, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10071-012-0510-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah Custance, Jennifer Mayer

Abstract

Empathy covers a range of phenomena from cognitive empathy involving metarepresentation to emotional contagion stemming from automatically triggered reflexes. An experimental protocol first used with human infants was adapted to investigate empathy in domestic dogs. Dogs oriented toward their owner or a stranger more often when the person was pretending to cry than when they were talking or humming. Observers, unaware of experimental hypotheses and the condition under which dogs were responding, more often categorized dogs' approaches as submissive as opposed to alert, playful or calm during the crying condition. When the stranger pretended to cry, rather than approaching their usual source of comfort, their owner, dogs sniffed, nuzzled and licked the stranger instead. The dogs' pattern of response was behaviorally consistent with an expression of empathic concern, but is most parsimoniously interpreted as emotional contagion coupled with a previous learning history in which they have been rewarded for approaching distressed human companions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 4 1%
Hungary 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 285 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 54 18%
Student > Master 47 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 14%
Researcher 34 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 42 14%
Unknown 61 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 28%
Psychology 64 22%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 18 6%
Neuroscience 10 3%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 72 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 513. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#50,081
of 25,597,324 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#17
of 1,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160
of 179,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,597,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.