| Title |
A Novel Web-enabled Healthcare Solution on HealthVault System
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Systems, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10916-010-9572-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lingxia Liao, Min Chen, Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues, Xiaorong Lai, Son Vuong |
| Abstract |
Complicated Electronic Medical Records (EMR) systems have created problems in systems regarding an easy implementation and interoperability for a Web-enabled Healthcare Solution, which is normally provided by an independent healthcare giver with limited IT knowledge and interests. An EMR system with well-designed and user-friendly interface, such as Microsoft HealthVault System used as the back-end platform of a Web-enabled healthcare application will be an approach to deal with these problems. This paper analyzes the patient oriented Web-enabled healthcare service application as the new trend to delivery healthcare from hospital/clinic-centric to patient-centric, the current e-healthcare applications, and the main backend EMR systems. Then, we present a novel web-enabled healthcare solution based on Microsoft HealthVault EMR system to meet customers' needs, such as, low total cost, easily development and maintenance, and good interoperability. A sample system is given to show how the solution can be fulfilled, evaluated, and validated. We expect that this paper will provide a deep understanding of the available EMR systems, leading to insights for new solutions and approaches driven to next generation EMR systems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 741 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 738 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 1% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 1% |
| Researcher | 6 | <1% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | <1% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 2% |
| Unknown | 693 | 94% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 17 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | <1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | <1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 696 | 94% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2012.
All research outputs
#18,308,895
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#803
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,632
of 94,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.