| Title |
Use of the iPhone for radiographic evaluation of hallux valgus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Skeletal Radiology, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00256-012-1455-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tolga Ege, Ozkan Kose, Kenan Koca, Bahtiyar Demiralp, Mustafa Basbozkurt |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to compare the measurements made using a smartphone accelerometer and computerized measurements as a reference in a series of 32 hallux valgus patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 25% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 36% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2017.
All research outputs
#5,957,595
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#289
of 1,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,149
of 166,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.