You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Brain Expression Genome-Wide Association Study (eGWAS) Identifies Human Disease-Associated Variants
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Genetics, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002707 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fanggeng Zou, High Seng Chai, Curtis S. Younkin, Mariet Allen, Julia Crook, V. Shane Pankratz, Minerva M. Carrasquillo, Christopher N. Rowley, Asha A. Nair, Sumit Middha, Sooraj Maharjan, Thuy Nguyen, Li Ma, Kimberly G. Malphrus, Ryan Palusak, Sarah Lincoln, Gina Bisceglio, Constantin Georgescu, Naomi Kouri, Christopher P. Kolbert, Jin Jen, Jonathan L. Haines, Richard Mayeux, Margaret A. Pericak-Vance, Lindsay A. Farrer, Gerard D. Schellenberg, Ronald C. Petersen, Neill R. Graff-Radford, Dennis W. Dickson, Steven G. Younkin, Nilüfer Ertekin-Taner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Australia | 1 | 25% |
Uzbekistan | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 75% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 4% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 260 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 72 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 19% |
Other | 19 | 7% |
Student > Master | 19 | 7% |
Professor | 18 | 6% |
Other | 57 | 20% |
Unknown | 42 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 95 | 34% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 11% |
Neuroscience | 23 | 8% |
Computer Science | 13 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 8% |
Unknown | 53 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,095,508
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#2,548
of 9,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,671
of 183,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#30
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.