↓ Skip to main content

Minimizing the Risk of Bleeding with NOACs in the Elderly

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Aging, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Minimizing the Risk of Bleeding with NOACs in the Elderly
Published in
Drugs & Aging, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40266-016-0376-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amartya Kundu, Partha Sardar, Saurav Chatterjee, Wilbert S. Aronow, Theophilus Owan, John J. Ryan

Abstract

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban have gained a lot of popularity as alternatives to warfarin for anticoagulation in various clinical settings. However, there is conflicting opinion regarding the absolute benefit of NOAC use in elderly patients. Low body mass, altered body composition of fat and muscle, renal impairment and concurrent presence of multiple comorbidities predispose elderly patients to many adverse effects with NOACs that are typically not seen in younger patients. There have been reports that NOAC use, in particular dabigatran, is associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly. Diagnosis and management of NOAC-associated bleeding in the elderly is difficult due to the absence of commonly available drug-specific antidotes that can rapidly reverse the anticoagulant effects. Moreover, in elderly patients, a number of factors such as the presence of other comorbid medical conditions, renal insufficiency, drug interactions from polypharmacy, risk of falls and dementia need to be considered before prescribing anticoagulation therapy. Elderly patients frequently have compromised renal function, and therefore dose adjustments according to creatinine clearance for NOACs need to be made. As each NOAC comes with its own unique advantages and safety profile, an individualized case by case approach should be adopted to decide on the appropriate anticoagulation regimen for elderly patients after weighing the overall risks and benefits of therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Other 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 34%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Psychology 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 31 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#4,924,630
of 24,230,934 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#345
of 1,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,080
of 316,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,230,934 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.