You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A systematic review of the behaviour change techniques and digital features in technology-driven type 2 diabetes prevention interventions
|
---|---|
Published in |
DIGITAL HEALTH, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.1177/2055207620914427 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luke Van Rhoon, Molly Byrne, Eimear Morrissey, Jane Murphy, Jenny McSharry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
Canada | 2 | 17% |
Australia | 1 | 8% |
Paraguay | 1 | 8% |
Ireland | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
Scientists | 4 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 209 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 12% |
Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
Researcher | 16 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 14% |
Unknown | 87 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 9% |
Psychology | 14 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
Computer Science | 8 | 4% |
Other | 36 | 17% |
Unknown | 93 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,163,031
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from DIGITAL HEALTH
#104
of 879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,534
of 395,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from DIGITAL HEALTH
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.