| Title |
Silkworm and spider silk scaffolds for chondrocyte support
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10856-008-3474-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kris Gellynck, Peter C. M. Verdonk, Els Van Nimmen, Karl F. Almqvist, Tom Gheysens, Gustaaf Schoukens, Lieva Van Langenhove, Paul Kiekens, Johan Mertens, Gust Verbruggen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 20% |
| Researcher | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 14% |
| Engineering | 13 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,971,592
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#32
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,747
of 82,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them