| Title |
Correction to Lancet Infect Dis 2020; published online March 11, https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1473-3099(20)30144-4
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Infectious Diseases, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30251-6 |
| Pubmed ID |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,839,027
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#3,416
of 6,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,358
of 392,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#156
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.