↓ Skip to main content

Leitlinie „Rhinosinusitis“ – Langfassung

Overview of attention for article published in HNO, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Leitlinie „Rhinosinusitis“ – Langfassung
Published in
HNO, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00106-011-2396-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

B.A. Stuck, C. Bachert, P. Federspil, W. Hosemann, L. Klimek, R. Mösges, O. Pfaar, C. Rudack, H. Sitter, M. Wagenmann, R. Weber, K. Hörmann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 21%
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Decision Sciences 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,482,726
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from HNO
#68
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,831
of 241,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HNO
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.