| Title |
No difference in 9-year outcome in CLBP patients randomized to lumbar fusion versus cognitive intervention and exercises
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-012-2382-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Froholdt, Olav Reikeraas, Inger Holm, Anne Keller, Jens Ivar Brox |
| Abstract |
To compare the 9-year outcome in patients with chronic low back pain treated by instrumented lumbar fusion versus cognitive intervention and exercises. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Canada | 2 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 39 | 23% |
| Unknown | 39 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 9% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 45 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,034,079
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#282
of 4,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,274
of 168,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#2
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,815 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.