You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proceedings from the 3rd European Clinical Consensus Conference for clinical trials in device-based hypertension therapies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Heart Journal, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa121 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felix Mahfoud, Michel Azizi, Sebastian Ewen, Atul Pathak, Christian Ukena, Peter J Blankestijn, Michael Böhm, Michel Burnier, Gilles Chatellier, Isabelle Durand Zaleski, Guido Grassi, Michael Joner, David E Kandzari, Ajay Kirtane, Sverre E Kjeldsen, Melvin D Lobo, Thomas F Lüscher, John William McEvoy, Gianfranco Parati, Patrick Rossignol, Luis Ruilope, Markus P Schlaich, Atif Shahzad, Faisal Sharif, Andrew S P Sharp, Horst Sievert, Massimo Volpe, Michael A Weber, Roland E Schmieder, Costas Tsioufis, William Wijns |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 18% |
| Ireland | 2 | 18% |
| Egypt | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Monaco | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,905,486
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#2,460
of 10,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,578
of 368,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#81
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.