↓ Skip to main content

International evidence-based recommendations on ultrasound-guided vascular access

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
650 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
610 Mendeley
Title
International evidence-based recommendations on ultrasound-guided vascular access
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00134-012-2597-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massimo Lamperti, Andrew R. Bodenham, Mauro Pittiruti, Michael Blaivas, John G. Augoustides, Mahmoud Elbarbary, Thierry Pirotte, Dimitrios Karakitsos, Jack LeDonne, Stephanie Doniger, Giancarlo Scoppettuolo, David Feller-Kopman, Wolfram Schummer, Roberto Biffi, Eric Desruennes, Lawrence A. Melniker, Susan T. Verghese

Abstract

To provide clinicians with an evidence-based overview of all topics related to ultrasound vascular access.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 610 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 597 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 73 12%
Researcher 71 12%
Student > Master 71 12%
Student > Postgraduate 67 11%
Student > Bachelor 51 8%
Other 146 24%
Unknown 131 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 344 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 11%
Engineering 15 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 1%
Unspecified 3 <1%
Other 25 4%
Unknown 149 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,693,277
of 24,615,949 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,870
of 5,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,988
of 167,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#9
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.