| Title |
Creatures of habit: accounting for the role of habit in implementation research on clinical behaviour change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-53 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Per Nilsen, Kerstin Roback, Anders Broström, Per-Erik Ellström |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 29% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 57% |
| Scientists | 10 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 397 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 379 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 60 | 15% |
| Researcher | 45 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 81 | 20% |
| Unknown | 80 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 71 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 71 | 18% |
| Unknown | 101 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 177. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2022.
All research outputs
#231,183
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#9
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,010
of 182,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.