↓ Skip to main content

In vivo evidence of the immunomodulatory activity of orally administered Aloe vera gel

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Pharmacal Research, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
In vivo evidence of the immunomodulatory activity of orally administered Aloe vera gel
Published in
Archives of Pharmacal Research, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12272-010-0315-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sun-A. Im, Young-Ran Lee, Young-Hee Lee, Myung-Koo Lee, Young In Park, Sungwon Lee, Kyungjae Kim, Chong-Kil Lee

Abstract

The gels of Aloe species contain immunomodulatory components such as aloctin A and acemannan. Most studies on these gels were performed in in vitro cell culture systems. Although several studies examined their immunomodulatory activity in vivo, the route of administration was intraperitoneal or intramuscular. Here, we evaluated the in vivo immunomodulatory activity of processed Aloe vera gel (PAG) in mice. Oral administration of PAG significantly reduced the growth of C. albicans in the spleen and kidney following intravenous injection of C. albicans in normal mice. PAG administration also reduced the growth of C. albicans in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. PAG administration did not increase ovalbumin (OVA)-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) generation in normal mice, but did increase it in high-fat-diet induced diabetic mice. These findings provide the first clear evidence for the immunomodulatory activity of orally administered Aloe vera gel.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 21 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Chemistry 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,919,351
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#72
of 1,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,523
of 94,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,292 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.