↓ Skip to main content

Understanding antibiotic stewardship for the critically ill

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Understanding antibiotic stewardship for the critically ill
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4030-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. J. De Waele, J. Schouten, G. Dimopoulos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 17%
Student > Master 10 16%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Professor 5 8%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 63%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2018.
All research outputs
#18,459,684
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,436
of 4,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,766
of 266,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#53
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.