↓ Skip to main content

Socio-behavioural risk factors for early childhood caries (ECC) in Cambodian preschool children: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Socio-behavioural risk factors for early childhood caries (ECC) in Cambodian preschool children: a pilot study
Published in
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40368-015-0215-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Turton, C. Durward, D. Manton, K. Bach, C. Yos

Abstract

This was to explore the socio-behavioural risk factors for ECC in Cambodia. Early childhood caries (ECC) is a significant health problem in Cambodia. A convenience sample of 362 primary caregiver-child dyads were selected. The children were aged between birth and 6 years old and participated in a structured interview and intra-oral examination. ECC was diagnosed in 244 of 362 (65.6 %) children and 178 (50.6 %) had severe early childhood caries (sECC). There were significant associations between caries experience and tooth brushing, dietary, and nursing habits. The odds ratio (OR) for sECC in those children who started brushing before the age of 18 months was 0.41 (CI 0.18, 0.93). However, for those children who continued to breast-feed after the age of 2 years the OR was 5.31 (CI 1.50, 18.79). The most prominent risk factors for ECC in the present study were lack of tooth brushing and breast-feeding past the age of 2 years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 19%
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,374,585
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
#155
of 282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,317
of 388,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 282 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them