| Title |
Evolocumab in HIV-Infected Patients With Dyslipidemia Primary Results of the Randomized, Double-Blind BEIJERINCK Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.025 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Franck Boccara, Princy N. Kumar, Bruno Caramelli, Alexandra Calmy, J. Antonio G. López, Sarah Bray, Marcoli Cyrille, Robert S. Rosenson, BEIJERINCK Investigators, David Baker, Mark Bloch, Robert Finlayson, Jennifer Hoy, Kenneth Koh, Norman Roth, Stephane De Wit, Eric Florence, Linos Vandekerckhove, Bruno Caramelli, Jose Valdez Ramalho Madruga, Sandra Wagner Cardoso, Greg Bondy, Michael Gill, George Tsoukas, Sylvie Trottier, Marek Smieja, Franck Boccara, Christine Katlama, Fabrice Bonnet, Francois Raffi, Laurent Cotte, Jean-Michel Molina, Jacques Reynes, Antonios Papadopoulos, Simeon Metallidis, Vassilios Paparizos, Vasileios Papastamopoulos, Cristina Mussini, Massimo Galli, Andrea Antinori, Antonio Di Biagio, Pierluigi Viale, Andrzej Horban, Nuno Marques, Daniel Coutinho, Joaquim Oliveira, Paula Freitas, Liliana-Lucia Preotescu, Iosif Marincu, Rodica Silaghi, Sorin Rugina, Noluthando Mwelase, Sheena Kotze, Jose Ignacio Bernardino de la Serna, Vicente Estrada Perez, Esteban Martinez, Adrian Curran, Dominique Laurent Braun, Alexandra Calmy, Enos Bernasconi, Matthias Cavassini, John Walsh, Julie Fox, Graeme Moyle, Robert Rosenson, Jamie Morano, Jason Baker, Gerald Pierone, Carl Fichtenbaum, Paul Benson, Deborah Goldstein, Joseph Sacco, Princy Kumar, Robert Grossberg, Kara Chew, Christopher DeFilippi, Vilma Drelichman, Norman Markowitz, David Parenti, Katherine Doktor, Paul Thompson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 21% |
| France | 3 | 11% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 57% |
| Scientists | 7 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 31% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 41 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2021.
All research outputs
#819,962
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,067
of 16,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,685
of 394,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#58
of 381 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 381 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.