You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ultra-efficient frequency comb generation in AlGaAs-on-insulator microresonators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-15005-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lin Chang, Weiqiang Xie, Haowen Shu, Qi-Fan Yang, Boqiang Shen, Andreas Boes, Jon D. Peters, Warren Jin, Chao Xiang, Songtao Liu, Gregory Moille, Su-Peng Yu, Xingjun Wang, Kartik Srinivasan, Scott B. Papp, Kerry Vahala, John E. Bowers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 33% |
| Researcher | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 50 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 60 | 35% |
| Engineering | 50 | 29% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2020.
All research outputs
#17,136,019
of 25,175,727 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#49,674
of 55,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,766
of 370,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1,291
of 1,415 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,175,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,415 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.