| Title |
Divergent levels of genetic variation and ploidy among populations of the rare shrub, Grevillea repens (Proteaceae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-008-9643-9 |
| Authors |
Gareth D. Holmes, Elizabeth A. James, Ary A. Hoffmann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 40% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 66% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,482,726
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#468
of 1,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,801
of 81,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.