| Title |
Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin in High-Risk Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dominick J Angiolillo, Usman Baber, Samantha Sartori, Carlo Briguori, George Dangas, David J Cohen, Shamir R Mehta, C Michael Gibson, Rishi Chandiramani, Kurt Huber, Ran Kornowski, Giora Weisz, Vijay Kunadian, Keith G Oldroyd, Han Ya-Ling, Upendra Kaul, Bernhard Witzenbichler, Dariusz Dudek, Gennaro Sardella, Javier Escaned, Samin Sharma, Richard A Shlofmitz, Timothy Collier, Stuart Pocock, Roxana Mehran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 16% |
| Spain | 9 | 8% |
| Mexico | 8 | 7% |
| Argentina | 5 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 5 | 5% |
| Colombia | 3 | 3% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2% |
| Kazakhstan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 42 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 80 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 8% |
| Scientists | 6 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 42 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 33% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 47 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#456,709
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,129
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,473
of 395,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#27
of 381 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 381 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.